IRC logs for #cip for Thursday, 2022-01-13

*** lfam <lfam!~lfam@user/lfam> has quit IRC04:37
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has joined #cip07:18
*** prabhakarlad <prabhakarlad!~prabhakar@pc.renesas.eu> has joined #cip08:51
*** toscalix_ <toscalix_!~toscalix@80.31.249.68> has joined #cip09:03
*** toscalix_ <toscalix_!~toscalix@80.31.249.68> has quit IRC09:03
*** toscalix_ <toscalix_!~toscalix@80.31.249.68> has joined #cip09:03
*** toscalix__ <toscalix__!~toscalix@90.167.167.99> has joined #cip09:30
*** toscalix_ <toscalix_!~toscalix@80.31.249.68> has quit IRC09:34
*** toscalix <toscalix!~toscalix@80.31.249.68> has joined #cip09:38
*** toscalix__ <toscalix__!~toscalix@90.167.167.99> has quit IRC09:38
*** uli <uli!~uli@55d40d81.access.ecotel.net> has joined #cip10:46
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-110-233-204-67.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has joined #cip12:45
*** jki <jki!~jki@165.225.27.19> has joined #cip12:54
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has quit IRC12:57
*** pave1 <pave1!~pavel@88.103.227.175> has joined #cip12:59
jki#startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting13:00
brloggerMeeting started Thu Jan 13 13:00:32 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jki. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:00
brloggerUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:00
brloggerThe meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting'13:00
*** brlogger changes topic to " (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:00
jkihi all!13:00
ulihello13:00
iwamatsuhi13:00
pave1hi13:00
masamihi13:00
alicefhi13:00
patersonc[m]hi13:01
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has joined #cip13:01
*** josiah <josiah!~kvirc@pool-100-16-211-90.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net> has joined #cip13:02
jkiok, let's get started then13:03
jki#topic AI review13:03
*** brlogger changes topic to "AI review (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:03
jki1. Provide v3 of kernelci patches for isar-cip-core - alicef13:03
alicefjki thanks for the review. v3 is still not done. bit busy with other work.13:04
jkiok, np. if i should help, let me know13:04
jki2. Propose tweet on KernelCI-CIP collaboration progress - alicef13:04
alicefpatersonc[m]: maybe we can decide here something to write ?13:05
patersonc[m]Probably best. Then the proposal can be sent to Neil for posting13:06
alicefI was thinking something like "check the CIP work on Kernelci https://github.com/orgs/kernelci/projects/11 @kernelci @cip"13:06
alicefI was thinking something like "check the CIP work on Kernelci https://github.com/orgs/kernelci/projects/11 @kernelci @cip_project"13:07
patersonc[m]alicef: We should probably meet to work out the next steps for cip+kernelci as well13:07
alicefyes13:07
jkiok, great13:09
jki3. Clarify with KernelCI whether CIP maintainers can get accounts - alicef13:09
patersonc[m]What are these accounts for btw? For KernelCI's GitHub?13:10
alicefstill working on this probably it will take some time for now. and is part of the kernelci next steps13:10
alicefpatersonc[m]: Is actually not account as is possible to do it programmatically13:10
alicefI asked iwamatsu  and pave1 to send me a mail with the development branch that they want to be enabled for development but didn't get it yet afaik13:11
jki"Clarify with KernelCI how CIP maintainers can get trigger private builds"13:11
jkibetter?13:11
pave1alicef: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/tree/ci/pavel/linux-test13:12
alicefactually the current task is for pavel and iwamatsu to send me a mail with the branch they want to be enabled for developement13:12
pave1This is what I'm using for testing, and I guess it makes sense to keep testing it.13:12
patersonc[m]jki: Gotcha, thanks13:12
alicefpave1: please send me a mail about this13:12
pave1ok :-).13:12
iwamatsualicef: I will do it.13:13
patersonc[m]You can also request branches to be supported as an issue ticket on GitHub: https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/issues/new?assignees=&labels=&template=new-kernel-branch.md&title=Add+branch+BRANCH+from+TREE13:13
alicefpave1: can you make a branch like for-kernelci?13:13
alicefoh right13:14
pave1alicef: The name of the branch does not really matter, so yes, I guess I can.13:14
patersonc[m]Or https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/issues/new?assignees=&labels=&template=new-kernel-branch.md&title=Add+branch+pavel-for-kernelci+from+cip13:14
alicefprobably the best is to follow patersonc[m] link and send a issue to kernelci-core13:14
patersonc[m]alicef or I can action the issue once created13:15
alicefspecifing that is a development branch13:15
alicefwhat you mean by "action the issue"13:15
alicef?13:15
patersonc[m]Create an MR13:16
patersonc[m]PR13:16
alicefwhatever is ok for you13:17
alicefjust remember that is a special PR for dealing with development branch13:18
alicefnot just enabling it13:18
jkiok, looks like we have (clearer) plan now13:19
jkianything else?13:19
jki313:19
jki213:19
jki113:19
jki#topic Kernel maintenance updates13:20
*** brlogger changes topic to "Kernel maintenance updates (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:20
pave1I was reviewing 5.10.91 and various series on the mailing lists.13:20
masamiThere are 7 CVEs this week. CVE-2021-4204 hasn't been fixed in the mainline yet.13:20
pave1Renesas ADC and ethernet patches were applied. Sound needs more work.13:20
ulidone with 5.10.87, was going to do 5.10.91...13:20
iwamatsuI reviewed 5.10.91.13:20
ulipave1: what's left to review?13:21
pave1Everything that should be relevant to us should be done. There's stuff left that scripts marked as irrelevant. I'll mail you with details.13:22
uliok13:22
jkiis the worksplit via wiki now more or less established?13:24
pave1I'll need to look into it.13:26
iwamatsuit hasn't been split yet./13:26
jki"old habits", or is there still something not fitting well?13:27
iwamatsuThere are duplicate reviews .13:29
iwamatsuallocate it automatically ?13:29
jkithat was my idea, but pavel said that splitting has to be "smart", and that might be hard13:30
pave1Lets see how this works, I'd say. I'll need to start using it.13:30
pave1Yes, splitting so that related series and related patches across the releases are reviewed by same person makes sense IMO.13:31
jkiso, someone needs to take a lead for a new kernel release to do that split13:31
jkiand then folks can start reviewing13:32
jkiok, let's put this on recall, I would say13:33
jkianything else for this topic?13:33
jki313:34
jki213:34
jki113:34
jki#topic Kernel testing13:34
*** brlogger changes topic to "Kernel testing (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:34
iwamatsulet's split it when I create the patch list.13:34
patersonc[m]No updates from me RE testing13:35
pave1For stable kernels, 4.4 and 4.19 are tested, but 5.10 fails to build due to gcc problems.13:35
aliceftomorrow I have a presentation at Linux conf au about CIP and KernelCI13:36
alicefno updates other than this13:36
alicefhttps://linux.conf.au/schedule/presentation/8/13:36
pave1It would be nice to get it fixed, we'll eventually hit it in our testing, too.13:36
alicefpatersonc[m]: maybe we can tweet about the presentation https://linux.conf.au/schedule/presentation/8/13:37
iwamatsupave1: yes, we need to create a enviromnet for it. And I am working this.13:37
pave1iwamatsu: Thank you!13:38
alicefalso kernelci tweeted about it https://twitter.com/kernelci/status/148136594836391117213:38
patersonc[m]alicef: I'll email Neil13:38
jkigood - anything else?13:40
jki313:40
jki213:40
jki113:40
jki#topic AOB13:40
*** brlogger changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"13:40
pave1There is 4.4.296-rt229 released, and the 4.4-rt releases are quite rare.13:41
pave1It would be great to get 4.4.296-cip release, so I could do -cip-rt...13:41
patersonc[m]Sounds like a good idea13:42
jkiand it should be due as well, one month after the last one13:42
iwamatsuI am going to relase new CIP kernel for 4.4 and 4.19. so I will 4.4.296-cip as 4.4.y cip tree.13:43
pave1THank you!13:44
jkiperfect, thanks!13:44
iwamatsuyou are welcome ;-)13:44
jkitwo topics from my side:13:44
jki1. does any one know how our chatbot is hosted?13:45
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@2a02:768:2307:40d6::f9e> has joined #cip13:45
alicefI know but I have to check old logs13:45
alicefjki: what you want to know ?13:45
alicefsomething specific?13:46
jkiasking because Codethink is leaving CIP13:46
alicefso we need a new bot ?13:46
jkiif they provided it, I don't expect a shutdown, but we may run into troubles when no one recalls who owns it when its broken13:47
alicefI have a similar think on #gentoo-kernel13:47
jkinot yet I strongly assume13:47
jkibut a plan b might be good to have13:47
patersonc[m]jki: Codethink set up the chatbot etc.13:47
alicefsomeone here is the maintainer but I cannot recollect the exact name now13:47
jkialicef: if you have information or even contacts about the current setup, please check13:47
jkiagain, just safety measure13:48
jkiok, topic #2: I'm off next Thursday13:49
jkialicef: would you be so kind to run the show? :)13:49
alicefsure13:49
jkithanks!13:49
jkiok, that's all from my side13:50
jkianything else?13:51
jki313:51
jki213:51
jki113:51
jki#endmeeting13:52
brloggerMeeting ended Thu Jan 13 13:52:02 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)13:52
brloggerMinutes:        https://irclogs.baserock.org/meetings/cip/2022/01/cip.2022-01-13-13.00.html13:52
brloggerMinutes (text): https://irclogs.baserock.org/meetings/cip/2022/01/cip.2022-01-13-13.00.txt13:52
brloggerLog:            https://irclogs.baserock.org/meetings/cip/2022/01/cip.2022-01-13-13.00.log.html13:52
*** brlogger changes topic to "Civil Infrastructure Platform Project. Find the logs at https://irclogs.baserock.org/cip/"13:52
jkithank you all!13:52
pave1Thank you, stay safe!13:52
ulithanks13:52
alicefthanks you13:52
masamithank you13:52
jkibye bye13:52
patersonc[m]ttfn13:52
iwamatsuthank you!13:52
patersonc[m]pave1: What kind of build coverage do you want for your CI branch in KernelCI?13:52
patersonc[m]Same Q for iwamatsu13:53
patersonc[m]Generally speaking, a good rule is to build fewer variants for branches that... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/8e6b1a69fd17b75aef086051b2ba496b6b6551ef)13:53
*** josiah <josiah!~kvirc@pool-100-16-211-90.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net> has quit IRC13:53
pave1patersonc: Well, the more the better :-).13:53
pave1patersonc: But similar configuration to what we have currently would be enough.13:53
patersonc[m]Okay13:54
patersonc[m]How often are you expecting to push?13:54
pave1Normally it is something like once or twice a week.13:55
pave1But I had pushes in half an hour when I was bisecting an issue.13:55
patersonc[m]FYI: https://github.com/kernelci/kernelci-core/issues/98313:56
pave1Ok, I'll take a look.13:57
pave1I should go, bye for now!13:58
*** pave1 <pave1!~pavel@88.103.227.175> has quit IRC13:59
*** jki <jki!~jki@165.225.27.19> has quit IRC14:02
*** uli <uli!~uli@55d40d81.access.ecotel.net> has left #cip14:42
*** masami <masami!~masami@FL1-110-233-204-67.tky.mesh.ad.jp> has quit IRC15:04
*** monstr <monstr!~monstr@2a02:768:2307:40d6::f9e> has quit IRC15:33
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has quit IRC18:22
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has joined #cip18:26
*** toscalix <toscalix!~toscalix@80.31.249.68> has quit IRC19:10
*** lfam <lfam!~lfam@user/lfam> has joined #cip20:31
*** lfam <lfam!~lfam@user/lfam> has quit IRC20:51
*** rajm <rajm!~robert@cpc126990-macc4-2-0-cust43.1-3.cable.virginm.net> has quit IRC22:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!