| *** mturquette_ has joined #cip | 02:08 | |
| *** mturquette has quit IRC | 02:12 | |
| *** mturquette_ is now known as mturquette | 02:12 | |
| *** patersonc has joined #cip | 06:08 | |
| *** weshuang has quit IRC | 06:33 | |
| *** rajm has joined #cip | 07:14 | |
| *** moxavict1r has joined #cip | 07:31 | |
| * rajm runs a BBB healthcheck with email to the list | 07:31 | |
| *** moxavict1r has left #cip | 07:33 | |
| rajm | and a successful renesas board HC with another list email | 07:35 |
|---|---|---|
| *** weshuang has joined #cip | 07:39 | |
| *** toscalix has joined #cip | 08:09 | |
| *** moxavict1r has joined #cip | 08:11 | |
| *** moxavict1r has left #cip | 08:11 | |
| *** moxavict2r has joined #cip | 08:12 | |
| *** moxavict2r has left #cip | 08:15 | |
| *** moxavict1r has joined #cip | 08:29 | |
| *** moxavict1r has left #cip | 08:31 | |
| toscalix | szlin: any point on the agenda for today's meeting? | 08:42 |
| *** moxavict1r has joined #cip | 08:43 | |
| szlin | toscalix: which version of kernel should we start to review? Based on ben's email yesterday, it should be 4.4.129 | 08:48 |
| toscalix | yep | 08:50 |
| *** moxavict1r has left #cip | 08:56 | |
| szlin | I don't have question before jumping into review work. | 08:59 |
| szlin | BTW, I just sent kernel patch via stable process - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10364735/ | 08:59 |
| patersonc | Mornin all | 09:00 |
| szlin | patersonc: hi | 09:01 |
| patersonc | szlin: Potential agenda item: Kernel maintenance testing requirements | 09:01 |
| szlin | I see. | 09:01 |
| szlin | let's start the meeting | 09:02 |
| szlin | #startmeeting | 09:02 |
| szlin | #topic roll call | 09:02 |
| szlin | please say hi if you are in the meeting | 09:02 |
| szlin | ._./ | 09:02 |
| rajm | hi | 09:02 |
| bwh | hi | 09:02 |
| toscalix | o/ | 09:02 |
| toscalix | hi | 09:02 |
| weshuang | hi | 09:03 |
| patersonc | hi | 09:03 |
| szlin | #topic 1. Kernel maintenance testing requirements | 09:03 |
| szlin | patersonc: Any thoughts? | 09:04 |
| patersonc | I'm asking wrt infrastructure. KernelCI/Jenkins etc. Is any required? Or will everyone be doing everything locally? | 09:04 |
| patersonc | At the moment CIP are setting up KernelCI and LAVA Labs for remote testing, but no Jenkins instance. I want to know if you see a need for a centralised build system. | 09:05 |
| patersonc | Would this help with maintenance? | 09:05 |
| patersonc | New commits can trigger builds/tests automatically etc. | 09:05 |
| bwh | I thought KernelCI had some provision for that already | 09:06 |
| toscalix | it does | 09:06 |
| bwh | Maybe not | 09:06 |
| toscalix | but simple | 09:06 |
| toscalix | since it was designed for testing the kernel only initially | 09:06 |
| szlin | Daniel Sangorrin has mentioned that he is going to use Fuego for testing | 09:07 |
| toscalix | linaro is already using kernelci to test beyond kernel, like agl | 09:08 |
| toscalix | and agl has plans to make fuego and lava compatible | 09:08 |
| szlin | I am not sure that if Fuego is overkill | 09:08 |
| toscalix | there is a big gap between where we are and needing anything beyond kernelci | 09:09 |
| toscalix | I mean, we need to set up our labs, get familiar with the lava set up, create/import tests | 09:09 |
| toscalix | probably adapt the kernelci interface to our use case a little... | 09:10 |
| patersonc | Okay | 09:10 |
| patersonc | I wasn't sure what KernelCI could do | 09:10 |
| szlin | toscalix: that's what Moxa doing...we are building the testlab with CI/ CD/ LT | 09:10 |
| toscalix | szlin: based on kernelci? | 09:11 |
| toscalix | using openQA? | 09:11 |
| szlin | based on jenkins and LAVA. But yes, openQA could be a option | 09:11 |
| toscalix | ok | 09:12 |
| toscalix | so you will be able to send results to the infra that renesas is setting up, cool | 09:12 |
| szlin | toscalix: Have you ever used openQA? | 09:14 |
| toscalix | szlin: yes. I was the manager of the team who developed initially, a few years back | 09:15 |
| szlin | cool. | 09:15 |
| toscalix | but the tool has come a long way since then | 09:15 |
| szlin | how come? | 09:16 |
| toscalix | now it has become a product almost | 09:16 |
| toscalix | Lots of effort on it | 09:16 |
| * rajm has used it but very much as an initial evaluation, was beginning to scratch surface | 09:17 | |
| szlin | I see. | 09:18 |
| rajm | very dep on using particular distros but that may not be a problem | 09:18 |
| toscalix | rajm: fedora, opensuse.... more and more distros using it | 09:19 |
| rajm | yes those 2 but maybe things are opeing out more | 09:19 |
| rajm | *opening | 09:20 |
| szlin | AFAIK, Debian is not using openqa. | 09:20 |
| szlin | bwh: please correct me if I am wrong. | 09:20 |
| bwh | Well there seems to be some unofficial attempt at using it: http://openqa.debian.net/ | 09:21 |
| szlin | https://debconf17.debconf.org/talks/69/ | 09:21 |
| *** vidda_ has joined #cip | 09:21 | |
| szlin | Adam Majer had a session with openqa in debconf17 | 09:21 |
| bwh | Right, I wasn't there | 09:22 |
| szlin | Back to the topic, any other discussion? | 09:22 |
| toscalix | In my opinion, there will be the default test framework for any complez linux system. The cost/benefit is insane. But I am bias since I feel part of the baby so... | 09:23 |
| toscalix | yes, offtopic | 09:23 |
| patersonc | Thanks for the info. It sounds like there is no big push for a CIP Jenkins server at this time. I'll look more into what KernelCI can do. | 09:23 |
| toscalix | patersonc: if there is need, let's discuss it, yes | 09:23 |
| toscalix | I have a question, | 09:23 |
| patersonc | Sure | 09:24 |
| toscalix | bwh: sent the patches for review. Is there anybody who is interested in review patches that cannot access to them or has problems with them? | 09:24 |
| szlin | patersonc: Since Daniel Sangorrin is using Fuego for testing, Fuero is a Jenkins-based test framework | 09:24 |
| patersonc | szlin: Okay. I guess it's a question of whether CIP wants to start centalizing Fuego etc. or not. | 09:26 |
| patersonc | toscalix: AGL uses Fuego right? | 09:26 |
| patersonc | Or just LTSI? | 09:26 |
| toscalix | not yet | 09:26 |
| toscalix | fuego compatibility with lava is not there yet | 09:27 |
| szlin | toscalix: I am reviewing the patch via linux-stable.git | 09:27 |
| patersonc | Ah okay | 09:27 |
| bwh | szlin: OK, but you won't be able to send replies without the mail. | 09:27 |
| toscalix | szlin: cool | 09:27 |
| *** HarryYJ_Jhou has joined #cip | 09:28 | |
| szlin | bwh: how about 1. cherry-pick 2. sign-off the patch 3. send the mail via git send-email if there is no issue | 09:28 |
| bwh | Sorry, why would you be sending a patch? | 09:29 |
| szlin | bwh: shouldn't we add "Signed-off-by" after reviewing the patch? | 09:30 |
| bwh | No, since the patches are already getting applied to a git branch they can be merged into CIP's branch | 09:30 |
| szlin | or just send out the mail and mention that this patch has be done | 09:30 |
| szlin | I see | 09:31 |
| patersonc | bwh: So there's no addition of reviewed-by tags either? | 09:31 |
| bwh | patersonc: Not usually but Greg would probably be willing to add them if that is sent before the end of the review cycle | 09:32 |
| patersonc | bwh: okay | 09:32 |
| szlin | I need to go since the meeting is overtime | 09:32 |
| bwh | szlin: So I suggest you make a note of the patches you reviewed and didn't see any issue with, and then send a list of those to cip-dev | 09:32 |
| bwh | plus separate mails about any problematic patches | 09:33 |
| szlin | bwh: ok, thanks. | 09:33 |
| szlin | any questions? | 09:33 |
| szlin | #endmeeting | 09:33 |
| szlin | thanks all | 09:33 |
| rajm | thanks szlin! | 09:33 |
| patersonc | Cheers | 09:34 |
| bwh | thanks | 09:34 |
| *** HarryYJ_Jhou has quit IRC | 09:34 | |
| *** toscalix_ has joined #cip | 09:37 | |
| toscalix_ | need to go, sorry | 09:37 |
| *** toscalix has quit IRC | 09:39 | |
| rajm | patersonc: has there been any comeback on my B@D instructions email re. the Renesas board? | 10:03 |
| patersonc | rajm: I haven't seen any feedback yet, sorry. I'll chase. | 10:13 |
| rajm | ok thanks! | 10:14 |
| * patersonc sends nudge | 10:14 | |
| rajm | :) | 10:25 |
| *** vidda_ has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 13:01 | |
| *** patersonc has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
| *** rajm has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 16:43 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
| *** toscalix_ has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| *** toscalix has joined #cip | 17:08 | |
| *** toscalix has quit IRC | 17:09 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 17:15 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 20:02 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 20:17 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 20:46 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 20:59 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 21:51 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 22:38 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 22:53 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 23:20 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 23:34 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!