| *** gmacario has joined #automotive | 04:10 | |
| *** Sisco has quit IRC | 04:58 | |
| *** Sisco has joined #automotive | 05:00 | |
| *** gmacario has quit IRC | 05:06 | |
| *** jobol has joined #automotive | 05:16 | |
| *** gmacario has joined #automotive | 05:58 | |
| *** leon-anavi has joined #automotive | 06:32 | |
| leon-anavi | morning | 06:36 |
|---|---|---|
| *** CTtpollard has joined #automotive | 07:18 | |
| *** Saint_Isidore has quit IRC | 07:19 | |
| *** ctbruce has joined #automotive | 07:27 | |
| *** sanjeev has joined #automotive | 07:32 | |
| *** anahuelamo has joined #automotive | 07:54 | |
| *** toscalix has joined #automotive | 08:13 | |
| *** jonathanmaw has joined #automotive | 08:28 | |
| *** jobol has quit IRC | 08:37 | |
| *** Saint_Isidore has joined #automotive | 08:38 | |
| *** jobol has joined #automotive | 08:38 | |
| *** Tarnyko has joined #automotive | 08:42 | |
| *** warter has joined #automotive | 08:46 | |
| warter | oops! ERROR: ParseError at /home/user/[...]/meta-agl/meta-agl/recipes-sota/rvi-sota-client/rvi-sota-client_git.bb:5: Could not inherit file classes/cargo.bbclass | 08:48 |
| warter | and I made a repo sync before that | 08:49 |
| *** warter is now known as jbocklage123 | 08:49 | |
| CTtpollard | jbocklage123: looks like bitbake is missing meta-rust | 08:50 |
| jbocklage123 | let me check the number of files in meta-rust... so you can compare | 08:51 |
| CTtpollard | jbocklage123: does bitbake-layers show meta-rust is being parsed? | 08:52 |
| leon-anavi | hi warter you need layer meta-rust and it should be defined in bblayers.conf. I have updated the templates for bblayers.conf and my patch has been merged. | 08:53 |
| leon-anavi | jbocklage123 ^^^ | 08:53 |
| leon-anavi | jbocklage123, please make sure that you are using bblayers.conf generated from the new templates (you should have got them after doing repo sync). | 08:54 |
| jbocklage123 | ah. I had to delete build/conf. A source ...env porter did not help. Now it seems to work... | 08:55 |
| leon-anavi | jbocklage123, alternatively, if you prefer to keep your old build/conf you can just add meta-rust to bblayers.conf manually. | 08:55 |
| jbocklage123 | I thought, the source... re-creates the bblayers.conf if the template changed... | 08:55 |
| jbocklage123 | nono! I LOVE generated content ;)) | 08:55 |
| leon-anavi | jbocklage123 ok :) | 08:55 |
| jbocklage123 | AGL's choice for IPC is dbus, right? | 08:56 |
| *** gunnarx has joined #automotive | 09:02 | |
| *** gunnarx has joined #automotive | 09:02 | |
| *** Saint_Isidore has quit IRC | 09:03 | |
| *** Saint_Isidore has joined #automotive | 09:14 | |
| *** gunnarx has quit IRC | 09:21 | |
| RzR | CTtpollard, hi | 09:35 |
| RzR | CTtpollard, I tested gdp on max | 09:35 |
| RzR | CTtpollard, it was ok | 09:36 |
| CTtpollard | RzR: thanks a bunch. how long did you enjoy the sunshine for beforehand? | 09:38 |
| RzR | what do you mean ? | 09:39 |
| RzR | btw I plan I have to upstream our demos too , 1st I send meta-oic patches to list ? | 09:39 |
| RzR | is it the right workflow ? | 09:39 |
| CTtpollard | RzR: from thursday '<RzR> CTtpollard, I've lunched the build I will test it after enjoying this sunny day' ;) | 09:40 |
| RzR | ah yes | 09:41 |
| CTtpollard | RzR: the list is fine, however it should now be based off the github repo. obviously that means pull requests as well | 09:42 |
| RzR | is it ready now ? | 09:42 |
| CTtpollard | The minnowbranch is not quite in there yet, but qemu, porter and raspi2 are | 09:42 |
| RzR | I assume I need to push to master 1st | 09:42 |
| RzR | CTtpollard, https://github.com/search?p=1&q=genivi-demo-platform&type=Repositories&utf8=%E2%9C%93 | 09:47 |
| RzR | which branch is best ? | 09:49 |
| CTtpollard | RzR: we're here now :) https://github.com/GENIVI/ | 09:49 |
| CTtpollard | And demo is now dev | 09:50 |
| CTtpollard | which will probably take me years to stop saying | 09:50 |
| RzR | sorry | 09:51 |
| RzR | I know ;) | 09:51 |
| *** Saint_Isidore has quit IRC | 09:57 | |
| RzR | CTtpollard, https://github.com/GENIVI/genivi-dev-platform/pull/3 | 09:57 |
| CTtpollard | cheers | 10:05 |
| CTtpollard | this again goes back to the point of how many support layers we wan't to hold by default, especially if not used in the build by default | 10:05 |
| RzR | it will be used by an other layer | 10:07 |
| *** Saint_Isidore has joined #automotive | 10:08 | |
| CTtpollard | yes, meta-genivi-demo | 10:09 |
| CTtpollard | gahh, dev-demo | 10:09 |
| CTtpollard | monday | 10:10 |
| RzR | meta-genivi-ocf-demo | 10:10 |
| *** Saint_Isidore has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
| CTtpollard | RzR: could that not become a part of meta-genivi-dev? | 10:12 |
| RzR | IMHO , it would be better to have it into a separate layer | 10:14 |
| RzR | CTtpollard, like that https://github.com/TizenTeam/genivi-dev-platform/commits/sandbox/pcoval/minnowboard | 10:16 |
| RzR | CTtpollard, any ETA of minnow branch in g-dev-p ? | 10:27 |
| CTtpollard | RzR: I'm hoping to hear back from chbae today | 10:27 |
| RzR | anyway oic can be merged on any | 10:28 |
| *** gmacario has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
| *** gmacario has joined #automotive | 10:46 | |
| CTtpollard | RzR: once the minnow branch is in place, all the work can be done in a fork/branch. Could you guys then do a wiki page on how to use it? The same was done for Sota client | 11:01 |
| *** Tarnyko has quit IRC | 11:05 | |
| *** Tarnyko has joined #automotive | 11:06 | |
| *** toscalix_ has joined #automotive | 11:12 | |
| *** toscalix has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| *** gunnarx has joined #automotive | 11:44 | |
| *** gunnarx has joined #automotive | 11:44 | |
| RzR | CTtpollard, ok can you suggest a wiki url to be used ? | 11:47 |
| CTtpollard | RzR: potentially a subpage of https://at.projects.genivi.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=11567879 | 11:48 |
| RzR | oki doing this now | 11:49 |
| *** gunnarx has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
| *** waltminer has joined #automotive | 13:02 | |
| waltminer | Good morning | 13:03 |
| CTtpollard | hey waltminer | 13:08 |
| waltminer | hey CTtpollard | 13:12 |
| *** perryl has left #automotive | 13:14 | |
| *** gunnarx has joined #automotive | 13:15 | |
| *** gunnarx has joined #automotive | 13:15 | |
| * CTtpollard hacks around a single branch approach | 13:29 | |
| gunnarx | Hack around as in avoiding? ;) | 13:42 |
| CTtpollard | heh, not in this case | 13:44 |
| *** jlrmagnus has joined #automotive | 13:45 | |
| *** chbae has joined #automotive | 13:48 | |
| gunnarx | Morning jlrmagnus | 13:55 |
| *** AlisonChaiken has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
| jlrmagnus | Morning gunnarx | 14:04 |
| jlrmagnus | 3 hours of morning meetings. Yay! | 14:05 |
| gunnarx | Great | 14:05 |
| gunnarx | Stay on IRC just in case you get bored ;) | 14:06 |
| *** tjamison has joined #automotive | 14:07 | |
| gunnarx | In other news Volvo will start selling tanks. Apparently we have experience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yeCG6SS5wI | 14:09 |
| gunnarx | Who needs a marketing department when others do the work... :) | 14:12 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix_: I just rejected your pull request to genivi-dev-platform's README for the reasons given. Please rework and resend it, or hand over the responsibility to make those changes to me. | 14:12 |
| *** masterkorp has left #automotive | 14:13 | |
| RzR | gunnarx, send us a sample tank, just to control it with a tizen ring , we have a point and destroy usecase , sanjeev | 14:14 |
| gunnarx | OK, will think about it. | 14:15 |
| RzR | we will demo it at next GENIVI AMM ;) | 14:15 |
| CTtpollard | haha | 14:19 |
| CTtpollard | GDP on tank | 14:19 |
| RzR | genivi destruction platform | 14:21 |
| *** astrophys has joined #automotive | 14:22 | |
| gunnarx | awesome | 14:31 |
| *** anahuelamo has quit IRC | 14:32 | |
| gunnarx | I can't really get over the video, you can't buy that kind of publicity... Granted most of the 1.3M views are probably Swedes so far. | 14:33 |
| *** anahuelamo has joined #automotive | 14:35 | |
| *** waltminer has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
| rjek | On the other hand, the rear of estate cars don't really need crumple zones :) | 14:35 |
| leon-anavi | hehe, viral video :) | 14:35 |
| *** astrophys has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
| gunnarx | leon-anavi, it will be now that #automotive gets a hold of it. The reach of #automotive is amazing ;) | 14:41 |
| leon-anavi | gunnarx, I have already shared it to other irc channels ;) | 14:41 |
| gunnarx | :) | 14:41 |
| toscalix_ | jonathanmaw: fine | 14:55 |
| toscalix_ | thanks for reviewing | 14:55 |
| *** toscalix_ is now known as toscalix | 14:55 | |
| toscalix | jonathanmaw: while checking the wiki pages changing demo by development I came across your deployment scripts. I think you will have to update the repo names | 14:55 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: yep. it's also a really ugly script, so a proper way of doing deployment would also be nice :) | 15:01 |
| toscalix | We will need to double check the build instructions on feature page and target pages once the migration is completed since the repos has old names | 15:01 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: where did you find the script? | 15:03 |
| toscalix | Release Howto page | 15:05 |
| toscalix | https://at.projects.genivi.org/wiki/display/GDP/GDP+release+howto | 15:05 |
| toscalix | RzR: genivi destruction platform..... nooooo! another name change no, please :-) | 15:10 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: odd. I can't find my script from that page. Perhaps we're thinking about different things | 15:11 |
| toscalix | checking | 15:11 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: ah, I think I understand what you mean | 15:11 |
| jonathanmaw | the manual instructions have been changed, and you surmise that my script also needs changing | 15:11 |
| toscalix | yes | 15:12 |
| toscalix | jonathanmaw: writing a ticket about it so we do not forget | 15:13 |
| toscalix | I have also related the tasks about changing the name development vs demo with the migration to github since not just the name but the links needs to be updated in the gdp-ivi9 build instructions for every target | 15:18 |
| toscalix | also for RVI SOTA client, I assume | 15:18 |
| toscalix | when we release the minnowboard port will be the right opportunity to check the other instructions, I guess | 15:19 |
| RzR | toscalix, I am building a qemu image to test before minnow release | 15:25 |
| chbae | Hello. | 15:26 |
| *** astrophys has joined #automotive | 15:26 | |
| gunnarx | Hello chbae | 15:27 |
| chbae | Hi. gunnarx. | 15:27 |
| gunnarx | jonathanmaw, toscalix. There are deployment scripts? :) | 15:27 |
| gunnarx | sounds promising :) | 15:27 |
| jonathanmaw | gunnarx: it's really ugly and fragile, hence why the only stuff in the wiki is manual instructions, which hopefully involve the application of common sense :) | 15:28 |
| gunnarx | that's always a dangerous assumption ;) | 15:29 |
| gunnarx | common sense is too uncommon | 15:29 |
| *** smiller6 has joined #automotive | 15:31 | |
| *** AlisonChaiken has joined #automotive | 15:35 | |
| toscalix | gunnarx: deployment today has two main steps. 1.- Make the images and artifacts available for GENIVI devop 2.- move those images/artifacts to the download infra. The current scripts only covers the first point | 15:36 |
| gunnarx | OK. If you need any help putting any of those steps into Go, let me know. | 15:38 |
| CTtpollard | chbae: are you happy to bring the minnowboard branch to github now? I was going to do it and rework your GDP commit manually on top of it, but didn't feel clean | 15:40 |
| chbae | toscalix: I thought that we need to add tag in genivi-demo-platform. ex) v9.0 like meta-genivi-demo. Is it ok? | 15:40 |
| toscalix | yes.... but not demo but dev, ok? | 15:40 |
| gunnarx | :) | 15:41 |
| toscalix | gunnarx: we will, thanks | 15:41 |
| gunnarx | dev dev dev dev dev | 15:41 |
| gunnarx | it's going to take a while :) | 15:41 |
| CTtpollard | can someone reboot gunnarx please | 15:41 |
| gunnarx | I will do it | 15:41 |
| chbae | CTtpollard: I thought that you can fork genivi/xxx to your github repo., clean up and then merge into genivi/xxx. That’s my recommendation. | 15:42 |
| *** praneeth has joined #automotive | 15:42 | |
| chbae | What I’m saying genivi-demo-platform, because of GDP-ivi9 release in https://at.projects.genivi.org/wiki/display/GDP/GDP-ivi9+version%3A+feature+page. :) | 15:42 |
| CTtpollard | chbae: are you ok with me recreating your patch ( it doesn't apply cleanly due to how we branch) | 15:42 |
| chbae | CTtpollard: ok. | 15:43 |
| CTtpollard | i.e this patch https://github.com/GENIVI/genivi-dev-platform/commit/b59c3727ed981603438d5dc58946d1cfcd5c71ab | 15:43 |
| chbae | you can recreate forcely. | 15:44 |
| toscalix | chbae: that page should mantion development instead of demo already | 15:45 |
| chbae | CTtpollard: Could you create “v9.0” tag in genivi-demo-platform.git. | 15:46 |
| chbae | toscalix: yes. but we released ivi9.0 under genivi-demo-platform. | 15:46 |
| toscalix | ah, you are talking about the tag that reflect what we released | 15:47 |
| toscalix | then yes, but if you want to tag something after that, dev. Is that ok for you or you have something different in mind | 15:47 |
| toscalix | ? | 15:47 |
| toscalix | we can also tag with dev the code we had when the name was changed, at AMM | 15:48 |
| toscalix | that can be of some interest in the future | 15:49 |
| chbae | toscalix: Did we release in genivi-demo-platform? right? | 15:49 |
| toscalix | up to you guys | 15:49 |
| toscalix | yes | 15:49 |
| gunnarx | As stated before, there are branches that should be tags instead. "ivi9-beta", "ivi9-rc1" and so on. | 15:49 |
| chbae | So IMO, we can use “GENIVI Development Platform” name after ivi9. | 15:49 |
| toscalix | fine with me | 15:50 |
| toscalix | CTtpollard: jonathanmaw do you guys agree? | 15:50 |
| gunnarx | ,,,so putting a tag on those previous points in history, and then getting rid of those branches | 15:50 |
| chbae | gunnarx: agree. | 15:51 |
| chbae | toscalix: and then, i’ll change Build from scratch GDP-ivi9 section in https://at.projects.genivi.org/wiki/display/GDP/GDP-ivi9+version%3A+feature+page. | 15:51 |
| chbae | gunnarx: However, meta-genivi-demo.git already has v7.0, v8.0, and v9.0 tag. | 15:52 |
| toscalix | they should, yes | 15:53 |
| chbae | gunnarx, toscalix, CTtpollard, jonathanmaw: If we would like to change tag name, we will decide it and do it. | 15:53 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: I'm not sure what I'm being asked about. Is this about what the "D" in GDP-ivi9 release stands for? | 15:53 |
| toscalix | tagging idea from chbae | 15:54 |
| chbae | We should create tag in genivi-demo-platform to know real release commit. | 15:56 |
| jonathanmaw | I have no objections to creating tags in genivi-dev-platform to identify previous releases | 15:56 |
| chbae | meta-genivi-demo are using v7.0, v8.0, and v9.0. So if we don’t change the tag naming, we need to use it in genivi-demo-platform. | 15:58 |
| chbae | jonathanmaw: Do you know release commit in genivi-demo-platform? | 15:59 |
| jonathanmaw | chbae: I'm not certain | 16:00 |
| chbae | CTtpollad, jonathanmaw: I recommend tag name(v9.0-rpi2, v9.0-porter, v9.0-qemux86) in genivi-demo-platform. | 16:00 |
| *** leon-anavi has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| chbae | jonathanmaw: Ok. Could you discuss with CTtpollard and create tag in genivi-demo-platform? I agree the naming what you decide. | 16:02 |
| toscalix | chbae: why do you think it is more useful to classify the tags based on releases first instead of target first. Just wondering... | 16:02 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: I think it's nicer in terms of alignment :) | 16:03 |
| RzR | CTtpollard, It builds also fine on qemu , https://github.com/GENIVI/genivi-dev-platform/pull/3 | 16:03 |
| toscalix | and a second question: why not two separate tags? | 16:03 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: two separate tags for what? | 16:03 |
| toscalix | reflect version and reflect target | 16:03 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: I still don't understand your question | 16:04 |
| chbae | 1. When we use “git tag” command, the list will be arranged in alphbet order. So it’s useful to use releases first. | 16:04 |
| toscalix | chbae: sold | 16:05 |
| chbae | 2. I can’t understand your question :) | 16:05 |
| chbae | toscalix: we also can consider target first. :) | 16:06 |
| toscalix | I am asking if it would be more flexible/useful to have a tag for the target and a different one for the release. Instead of v9.0-rpi2 ... "v9.0" + "rpi2" | 16:06 |
| toscalix | two tags | 16:06 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: genivi-demo-platform is different for rpi2 and porter, so they point at different refs | 16:07 |
| chbae | toscalix: A repo doesn’t have same tag name. | 16:07 |
| jonathanmaw | therefore need multiple tags | 16:07 |
| chbae | ex) we use v9.0 tag in rpi2 branch and then we can’t use v9.0 tag in port branch. | 16:08 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: also, tags are deliberately hard to change. the tag we call "rpi2" will stay as that release | 16:08 |
| toscalix | I see | 16:09 |
| jonathanmaw | toscalix: and by "deliberately hard to change" I mean "if you tell me to change them, I will argue with you for 3 hours" | 16:09 |
| toscalix | if you guys agree on the naming scheme, fine with me | 16:09 |
| chbae | So I recommend we can use target and version’s combination. I’m fine to use “target first” or “version first”. | 16:09 |
| toscalix | jonathanmaw: I would call that...very close to impossible to change | 16:10 |
| toscalix | chbae: the reasons pointed for using number first are solid | 16:10 |
| toscalix | go ahead | 16:10 |
| toscalix | please remember that the numbering schema will change.... probably | 16:11 |
| jonathanmaw | it gets slightly messier when we consider the "*-beta" and "*-rc1" tags | 16:11 |
| chbae | toscalix: yes. | 16:11 |
| toscalix | we will use a numbering schema that will be different for releases (external) and internal. | 16:12 |
| toscalix | so we will use a number to reflect alfas, betas, etc. for devs | 16:12 |
| chbae | toscalix: cool. | 16:12 |
| toscalix | still giving some thoughts about how | 16:12 |
| toscalix | checking previous experiences | 16:13 |
| chbae | jonathanmaw: yes but IMO, it’s enought to add just release tag in ivi9 release. | 16:13 |
| jonathanmaw | chbae: ok. iirc, ivi7 and ivi8 releases didn't use genivi-demo-platform, so it'll just be tagging one release | 16:15 |
| jonathanmaw | that makes things simpler :) | 16:15 |
| chbae | yes. | 16:15 |
| chbae | but I don’t know real release commit id. So please discuss with Tom and do it :) | 16:16 |
| chbae | FYI: https://www.linux.com/news/watch-videos-embedded-linux-conference-openiot-summit-north-america-2016?_utm_source=1-2-2 | 16:16 |
| chbae | There is toscalix’s presentation. | 16:17 |
| toscalix | chbae... I was sick as hell that day. I really thought I was not going to make it that day. | 16:17 |
| toscalix | and the day before | 16:18 |
| toscalix | thanks god my partner was with me | 16:18 |
| toscalix | RzR was there | 16:19 |
| chbae | :) | 16:19 |
| chbae | I’ll join next ELCE 2016 on Oct. | 16:19 |
| toscalix | chbae: https://at.projects.genivi.org/wiki/display/GDP/GDP+Out+There#GDPOutThere-April2016:GDPatELC2016 | 16:20 |
| toscalix | slides and video linked | 16:20 |
| toscalix | chbae: I will see you there | 16:20 |
| chbae | COOL. | 16:20 |
| *** ctbruce has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
| chbae | I’ll go to bed. see you tomorrow. | 16:22 |
| chbae | bye. | 16:22 |
| *** chbae has left #automotive | 16:22 | |
| RzR | ;) | 16:24 |
| *** jlrmagnus has quit IRC | 16:33 | |
| jonathanmaw | tags pushed. they point to the old meta-genivi-demo repo, as they did in the release | 16:42 |
| jonathanmaw | erk. I got genivi-demo-platform and genivi-dev-platform confused in the tag annotations | 16:43 |
| *** gmacario has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| jonathanmaw | not even consistently so I can pretend I did it deliberately :S | 16:43 |
| jonathanmaw | I think rewriting history and altering the tags would be a graver (and more hypocritical) sin than leaving the annotations slightly wrong. So I guess I'll just have to leave it. | 16:46 |
| *** jonathanmaw has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
| *** mvick has joined #automotive | 16:51 | |
| *** toscalix has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** waltminer has joined #automotive | 17:13 | |
| *** gmacario has joined #automotive | 17:16 | |
| *** gmacario has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
| *** Saint_Isidore has joined #automotive | 17:25 | |
| *** bjones has joined #automotive | 17:32 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has joined #automotive | 17:45 | |
| *** jjardon has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
| *** jjardon has joined #automotive | 18:49 | |
| *** waltminer has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
| *** gunnarx has quit IRC | 18:53 | |
| *** waltminer has joined #automotive | 18:56 | |
| *** AlisonChaiken has quit IRC | 19:08 | |
| *** Sisco has quit IRC | 19:20 | |
| *** AlisonChaiken has joined #automotive | 19:22 | |
| *** Sisco has joined #automotive | 19:31 | |
| *** Sisco has quit IRC | 19:36 | |
| *** Sisco has joined #automotive | 19:37 | |
| *** Sisco has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
| *** Sisco has joined #automotive | 19:45 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has quit IRC | 20:33 | |
| *** Tarnyko1 has joined #automotive | 20:45 | |
| *** Tarnyko has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has joined #automotive | 20:48 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
| *** AlisonChaiken has quit IRC | 21:34 | |
| *** jobol has quit IRC | 21:39 | |
| *** AlisonChaiken has joined #automotive | 21:52 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has joined #automotive | 21:53 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| *** AlisonChaiken has quit IRC | 22:16 | |
| *** AlisonChaiken has joined #automotive | 22:25 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has joined #automotive | 22:28 | |
| *** tjamison has left #automotive | 22:33 | |
| *** jlrmagnus has quit IRC | 22:47 | |
| *** smiller6 has quit IRC | 22:55 | |
| *** astrophys has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!