| *** gtristan has quit IRC | 05:18 | |
| *** paulwaters_ has joined #baserock | 07:00 | |
| *** edcragg has joined #baserock | 07:24 | |
| *** bruce_ has joined #baserock | 07:29 | |
| *** fay_ has joined #baserock | 07:32 | |
| *** bashrc_ has joined #baserock | 08:03 | |
| *** rdale has joined #baserock | 08:23 | |
| *** anahuelamo has joined #baserock | 08:24 | |
| *** jonathanmaw has joined #baserock | 08:30 | |
| *** edcragg has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
| *** ssam2 has joined #baserock | 08:57 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v ssam2 | 08:57 | |
| *** edcragg has joined #baserock | 09:13 | |
| *** locallycompact has joined #baserock | 09:32 | |
| franred | pedroalvarez, should we revert https://gerrit.baserock.org/#/c/2042/ until jjardon sends the patch to fix the issue? (IMHO the change needs some thoughs as I wrote in the patch) | 10:13 |
|---|---|---|
| *** gtristan has joined #baserock | 10:14 | |
| pedroalvarez | franred: I agree, it's going to take some time | 10:15 |
| pedroalvarez | also it might be missing more dependencies | 10:17 |
| pedroalvarez | franred: thanks | 10:19 |
| franred | pedroalvarez, thanks for merging it | 10:21 |
| rjek | Does lorry detect the overwriting of lightweight, non-annotated, tagS? | 10:54 |
| JPohlmann | Hi folks, how's it going? | 11:03 |
| ssam2 | rjek: lorry doesn't try to detect any of that | 11:06 |
| * locallycompact pats out sleeve fires | 11:06 | |
| locallycompact | fine | 11:06 |
| ssam2 | rjek: you can configure whether it force-updates the tags or not, so you can make it break on force-overwrites to things in refs/ | 11:06 |
| ssam2 | rjek: not sure if lightweight, non-annotated tags exist in the refs/ namespace though | 11:07 |
| ssam2 | JPohlmann: prosiacally. how about you | 11:07 |
| ssam2 | prosaically even | 11:07 |
| JPohlmann | ssam2: Everything's good over here. I'm bathing in the sunlight that comes through the window while doing some hacking. | 11:10 |
| franred | JPohlmann, you know that happens in MCR too.... once a year ;-) | 11:12 |
| mwilliams_ct | [citation needed] | 11:13 |
| pedroalvarez | franred: you have to be lucky to have a bath with sunlight here in MCR...! | 11:13 |
| mwilliams_ct | ssam2: according to https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21031201/how-can-i-list-all-lightweight-tags lightweigt tags are in regs/tags/. would you expect lorry to detect changes to that as a result? | 11:15 |
| JPohlmann | franred: There's certainly less rain in Luebeck but MCR is better than it's reputation ;) | 11:16 |
| JPohlmann | its even | 11:16 |
| ssam2 | mwilliams_ct: i'd expect it to break if force-updates to refs/tags weren't allowed, yes | 11:22 |
| mwilliams_ct | Cool, thanks | 11:23 |
| *** toscalix has joined #baserock | 13:01 | |
| *** tiagogomes has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** toscalix has quit IRC | 15:54 | |
| *** franred has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
| *** bruce_ has quit IRC | 16:23 | |
| *** jonathanmaw has quit IRC | 16:23 | |
| *** ssam2 has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| *** bashrc_ has quit IRC | 16:59 | |
| *** gtristan has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
| *** bruce_ has joined #baserock | 17:25 | |
| *** locallycompact has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
| *** rdale has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| *** edcragg has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
| jjardon | Hi, what is the easiest way to build one of the x86_32 systems in a x86_64 machine? | 18:53 |
| jjardon | mmm, I guess a 32bit chroot | 18:54 |
| jjardon | this can help me: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arch32-light/ | 18:55 |
| rjek | linux32? | 18:55 |
| *** fay_ has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
| jjardon | rjek: how that would actually work? | 19:02 |
| rjek | Oh, it wouldn't pass -m32 would it | 19:02 |
| rjek | 64 bit executables will still run, but uname will lie. | 19:03 |
| rjek | I suppose the build tool needs to know about -m32 | 19:03 |
| radiofree | chroot is fine | 19:09 |
| radiofree | if you do linux32 chroot . | 19:09 |
| radiofree | oh, using baserock | 19:09 |
| *** locallycompact has joined #baserock | 19:32 | |
| jjardon | Is there any place where this is documented in the wiki? | 20:22 |
| radiofree | are you using ybd? | 22:53 |
| radiofree | maybe you can just pass the arch as x86 | 22:53 |
| radiofree | jjardon: ^ | 22:54 |
| jjardon | radiofree: I tried x86_32 but didnt work | 22:54 |
| radiofree | what failed? | 22:54 |
| jjardon | one sec | 22:55 |
| jjardon | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/34EVkdsO/ | 22:57 |
| jjardon | radiofree: ^ | 22:57 |
| *** edcragg has joined #baserock | 22:57 | |
| radiofree | something seems very broken there checking target system type... Invalid configuration `x86_32-bootstrap-linux-gnu': machine `x86_32-bootstrap' not recognized | 22:58 |
| radiofree | i would imagine simply extracting an existing x86_32 base system tarball and doing `linxu32 chroot .` would work | 22:58 |
| radiofree | and it's probably not even essential to run linux32 (I've always done that out of habit because mesa used to be a pain in the arse) | 22:59 |
| jjardon | radiofree: you mean build system, right? let me try that | 23:00 |
| radiofree | you'll probably need to mount bind proc, and copy /etc/resolv.conf into the etc/ folder in the chroot | 23:01 |
| jjardon | I think the baserock-chroot already do that for me? http://wiki.baserock.org/guides/chroot/ | 23:03 |
| radiofree | probably | 23:03 |
| * jjardon forgot how slow this hotel connection is | 23:03 | |
| radiofree | i've never used that | 23:03 |
| radiofree | it seems to demand i install things in /opt | 23:03 |
| radiofree | interestingly you can't actually use that from within a baserock system! | 23:04 |
| radiofree | (no schroot) | 23:04 |
| jjardon | ha! | 23:04 |
| jjardon | time to file a bug? :P | 23:04 |
| radiofree | you can essential do the same thing as https://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/baserock-dev-baserock.org/2015-August/013252.html | 23:05 |
| radiofree | but with x86_32 (obviously) | 23:05 |
| jjardon | cool, thanks | 23:06 |
| paulsherwood | jjardon: any idead about https://github.com/devcurmudgeon/ybd/issues/203 ? | 23:11 |
| paulsherwood | istm it's more likely to be definitions than ybd? | 23:12 |
| * jjardon checks | 23:12 | |
| paulsherwood | oh, i see this has been discussed above? | 23:12 |
| jjardon | paulsherwood: nope, she is trying to crosscompile to x86_32 in a x86_64 machine | 23:13 |
| jjardon | yep, Im trying to do the same now as well :) | 23:13 |
| jjardon | anahuelamo: ^ | 23:13 |
| paulsherwood | 23:58 < radiofree> something seems very broken there checking target system type... Invalid configuration `x86_32-bootstrap-linux-gnu': machine `x86_32-bootstrap' not recognized | 23:14 |
| paulsherwood | sounds like the same issue? | 23:14 |
| radiofree | i guess that really should work | 23:14 |
| radiofree | but it's probably awkward at the "building your compiler using the hosts toolchain" stage | 23:15 |
| radiofree | hence using a chroot | 23:15 |
| paulsherwood | ah, ack. | 23:15 |
| jjardon | also, Im a bit worried about those "--with-lib-path="=$PREFIX/lib:=$PREFIX/lib64"" lines; dont think they make a lot of sense in a 32 bit system | 23:16 |
| paulsherwood | anahuelamo claimed morph succeeded... i wonder what's the difference | 23:17 |
| jjardon | mmm, not in my chroot: | 23:18 |
| jjardon | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/GPP0qxQw/ | 23:18 |
| jjardon | maybe she was using a vm? | 23:19 |
| paulsherwood | yes, i believe she was | 23:20 |
| paulsherwood | gdp *mearly* building now... | 23:25 |
| paulsherwood | nearly | 23:25 |
| paulsherwood | http://paste.baserock.org/ehopevuyez | 23:26 |
| jjardon | paulsherwood: that broke with the upgrade to Qt5.6; any idea why genivi needs a special qtwayland? | 23:30 |
| jjardon | paulsherwood: radiofree https://gerrit.baserock.org/#/c/1205/ ? or https://gerrit.baserock.org/#/c/1356/ ? We really need to have a working Qt in the cache | 23:33 |
| * jjardon can't believe is saying that XD | 23:33 | |
| * paulsherwood has no idea why genivi needs special qtwayland | 23:33 | |
| jjardon | http://git.baserock.org/cgit/delta/qt5/qtwayland.git/commit/?h=baserock/v5.5.1-genivi&id=629247affff0f63dc14ce2c2dcde55998fee9def | 23:36 |
| jjardon | paulsherwood: can you try to build that version of qtwayland? if it fails maybe we have to rebase that patch against qtwayland 5.6 | 23:37 |
| paulsherwood | ok | 23:40 |
| jjardon | mmm, seems that patch has been already merged: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/121297/ | 23:40 |
| * jjardon doesnt know enough about the genivi system to know if something more is needed | 23:41 | |
| * paulsherwood neither | 23:45 | |
| *** edcragg has quit IRC | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!