IRC logs for #cip for Thursday, 2019-12-19

*** rajm has joined #cip02:38
*** rajm has quit IRC03:46
*** rajm has joined #cip07:29
*** therisen has joined #cip07:44
*** masashi910 has joined #cip07:46
masashi910quit07:48
*** masashi910 has quit IRC07:48
*** masashi910 has joined #cip07:51
*** pave1 has joined #cip08:54
*** suzuki90 has joined #cip08:58
*** kazu has joined #cip08:59
masashi910#startmeeting CIP IRC weekly meeting09:00
brlogger`Meeting started Thu Dec 19 09:00:02 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is masashi910. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.09:00
brlogger`Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.09:00
brlogger`The meeting name has been set to 'cip_irc_weekly_meeting'09:00
*** brlogger` changes topic to " (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:00
masashi910#topic rollcall09:00
*** brlogger` changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:00
pave1hi09:00
masashi910please say hi if you're around09:00
kazuhi09:00
iwamatsuhi09:00
suzuki90hi09:00
wenshi09:00
patersonchi09:00
masashi910#topic AI review09:00
*** brlogger` changes topic to "AI review (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:00
masashi9101. Test LTS (pre)releases directly - patersonc09:00
patersoncHello09:01
masashi910Chris-san, hi!09:01
masashi910Chris-san, do you have updates?09:01
patersoncI've now improved the way the commits we test are shown in GitLab09:01
patersonce.g. https://gitlab.com/cip-playground/linux-stable-rc-ci/pipelines09:01
patersoncIt's now clear which commit is tested09:02
patersoncLast 2 things remaining are to merge the PRs, and move everything to the cip-testing project09:02
masashi910patersonc: thanks! OK, shall we keep this AI open?09:02
patersoncYes please09:03
patersoncGetting there...09:03
masashi910patersonc: sure!09:03
masashi9102. Create a way/process to run LTP only for release tests - patersonc09:03
masashi910patersonc: do you have updates on this?09:03
patersoncProcess has been proposed, MRs are submitted09:03
patersoncI just need to document the process on the Wiki and merge09:04
patersonc(process was also agreed by maintainers)09:04
patersoncFeel free to keep this open09:04
masashi910patersonc: thanks for your progress! then, shall we keep this AI open as well?09:04
patersoncYep09:05
masashi910patersonc: OK!09:05
masashi9103. Combine rootfilesystem with kselftest binary - Iwamatsu-san09:05
masashi910Iwamatsu-san, do you have updates on this?09:05
iwamatsumasashi910: No update.09:05
iwamatsuplease keep this A.I.09:05
masashi910iwamatsu: thanks for your report. Sure, I will keep this ai open.09:06
masashi9104. Document a process on how to add tests to the CIP test setup - patersonc09:06
patersoncNo progress09:06
masashi910patersonc: thanks for your report!09:06
masashi9105. Arrangement of F2F Kernel Meeting in Nurnberg - masashi91009:07
masashi910I set up a doodle poll last week.09:07
masashi910So far, only Chris-san responded to this. I would like to report the result to TSC tomorrow. So, please fill your availability to the poll.09:07
masashi910https://doodle.com/poll/73if9scwqrh5ge3809:07
masashi910then, let me move to next.09:07
patersonc0/09:07
masashi910#topic kernel maintenance updates09:07
*** brlogger` changes topic to "kernel maintenance updates (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:08
patersoncThere is a chance I'll only be attending EW remotely, depending on budget.09:08
masashi910patersonc: I see. If the meeting is set up, I will also set up the zoom channel.09:09
patersoncmasashi910: Thanks09:09
masashi910pave1, iwamatsu, wens, bwh: do you have any updates?09:10
wensclassify-failed-patches will now (pending merge request) include stable patch review series from Greg. there are still some patches that are left out due to random tags. I'll add these as I find them.09:10
wensI assume people likely don't want Sasha's AUTOSEL series to be included though09:10
pave1I did reviews on 4.19.89 and 1.19.90, and am now in progress of merging of "Add RZ/G2N SYSC/RST/Clock/PFC support" series.09:10
iwamatsuI review LTS-rc on stable ML, I send some comment.09:11
wenscip-kernel-sec gained (pending MR) four new CVEs, one is fixed, three (as of commit time) are not09:11
pave1wens: Yes, excluding autosel stuff should save a lot of work.09:12
masashi910wens, pave1, iwamatsu: thanks for your works!09:12
wensthere's also a new make target that will show mails that are probably patches but aren't included09:13
pave1wens: Could we talk after the meeting?09:13
wenspave1: sure09:13
patersonco/09:13
masashi910wens, pave1: thanks!09:13
masashi910any other topics?09:13
masashi910309:13
masashi910209:13
masashi910109:13
patersoncyes09:14
masashi910#topic Kernel testing09:14
*** brlogger` changes topic to "Kernel testing (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:14
patersonc Just to let you all know, Biju and Fabrizio will be leaving Renesas tomorrow, so you'll see a dramatic drop in patches coming from them :)09:14
patersoncIf there is any feedback you need on patches etc. before then, it may be worth asking today09:14
patersoncSorry for the short notice09:14
pave1patersonc: They will be missed...09:14
patersoncpave1: Very much so!09:14
masashi910patersonc: I see. Thanks for sharing this info. And please send our best regards to them for their contributions!09:15
patersoncI will09:15
masashi910patersonc: the floor is yours09:15
patersoncBack to CIP testing...09:15
patersoncAs reported earlier I've been improving the LTS stable-rc build/testing process09:16
patersoncPretty much done now, just need to merge and move the project to cip=testing09:16
patersoncI've also been working on setting up LTP testing for '-rc' branches09:16
patersoncThe Mentor lab/boards are back online after some lab maintenance last weekend09:16
patersoncI'll merge CI support for them soon, but there is a worry that the internet connection is randomly very slow09:17
patersoncWhich can cause jobs to fail, often09:17
patersoncI think that's about it from me. Any queries?09:17
masashi910patersonc: thanks for your works!09:18
patersoncNo worries09:18
masashi910does anybody have any questions, or any other topics?09:19
masashi910309:19
masashi910209:19
masashi910109:19
masashi910#topic CIP Core09:19
*** brlogger` changes topic to "CIP Core (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:19
kazuhello09:19
masashi910kazu: the floor is yours09:19
kazu1. PDP: Package review on-going, please start discussions about specific packages if you need09:19
kazuI'm a bit worrying no discussion about the packages :)09:20
kazu2. Just started https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/deby/issues/4; use the existing configs for kernel builds09:20
kazuI would like to ask one question about this later09:20
kazu3. In-progress https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/deby/issues/7; still checking and reusing the old script to submit tests to LAVA: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-core/deby/blob/master/poky/scripts/lava-submit-job.sh09:20
kazuI will focus on this in this month09:21
kazuThat's all from me, any question?09:21
masashi910kazu: regarding 2, "I would like to ask one question about this later", do you mean after the call?09:21
kazusorry, in AOB is better09:21
patersonckazu: Do CIP plan to support all of the dependency patches long-term? Or just the requested packages?09:21
masashi910kazu: I see.09:21
kazupatersonc sorry, what does " the dependency patches" mean here?09:22
patersoncI think the security group requested 19(?) packages? But they require another x packages on top09:23
kazupatersonc Yes, correct09:23
patersoncWill we support everything long-term? Or just the 1909:23
kazupatersonc Dependency packages will be discussed in the next step, they are now requesting the 21 packages first09:24
patersoncAh okay09:24
patersoncThanks09:24
kazubecause reviewing everything in one proposal is a bit complicated :)09:24
kazuany other topics?09:24
masashi910kazu: thank you!09:25
masashi910then let's move to the next09:25
masashi910#topic Software update09:25
*** brlogger` changes topic to "Software update (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:25
suzuki90hi09:25
suzuki90I've put a license file of apache license 2.0 into the top of cip-sw-updates-demo repository.09:25
suzuki90https://gitlab.com/cip-playground/cip-sw-updates-demo/blob/master/LICENSE09:25
suzuki90And I'm preparing an approval request for creating our WG's subgroup in cip-project of Gitlab.09:25
suzuki90That's all from me.09:26
masashi910suzuki90: Thanks!09:26
masashi910any other topics?09:26
masashi910309:26
masashi910209:26
masashi910109:26
masashi910#topic AOB09:26
*** brlogger` changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: CIP IRC weekly meeting)"09:26
masashi9101. IRC meeting next week09:26
masashi910Although it is a holiday season, I would like to hold an IRC meeting next week.09:26
masashi910309:27
masashi910209:27
masashi910109:27
kazuhi09:27
masashi910kazu: please09:27
kazucan i ask one?09:27
patersoncI'll be missing the meeting for the next 2 weeks09:27
masashi910patersonc: OK, thanks for letting me know.09:27
kazuI'm checking the existing kernel configs for each CIP reference hardware, the following understanding correct?09:27
kazuAvailable configs: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/cip-kernel-config/tree/master/4.19.y-cip/09:28
pave1So Dec 26? Not sure if I'll be able to make that one.09:28
kazuUsed configs: https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-cip-pipelines/blob/master/trees/linux-4.19.y-cip.yml09:28
kazuqemux86-64: (no config?)bbb: (no config?)iwg20m: renesas_shmobile_defconfigsimatic-ipc227e: ?OpenBlocks IoT: plathome_obsvx2.confighihope-rzg2m: renesas_defconfig09:28
kazuOops, will add one by one...09:28
patersoncI think that's correct09:28
kazuqemux86-64: (no config?)09:28
kazubbb: (no config?)09:28
kazuiwg20m: renesas_shmobile_defconfig09:28
masashi910pave1: thanks. No worries.09:29
kazusimatic-ipc227e: ?09:29
kazuOpenBlocks IoT: plathome_obsvx2.config09:29
kazuhihope-rzg2m: renesas_defconfig09:29
kazuI just want to confirm if there are configs for qemux86-64 and bbb or not...09:30
patersoncNo that I've seen09:30
patersoncIf they are added I'll start building them in CI :)09:30
iwamatsukazu: I have a config to qemu-x86-64. so I will send PR to config repo.09:30
pave1Do we have qemu/bbb configured so that it could be used for testing if we hav ethe configs?09:30
patersoncOr if someone points me to a suitable config elsewhere/intree09:31
patersoncpave1: qemu - yes. BBB - maybe e/Jan09:31
kazupatersonc iwamatsu Thank you09:31
patersoncWe can build without the boards in the lab though09:31
masashi910kazu, patersonc, iwamatsu, pave1: thanks for your discussion.09:32
pave1patersonc: Yes, agreed.09:32
masashi910kazu: do you think any AI needed?09:32
kazuAt least, the config for qemux86-64 will be added through the PR?09:33
patersoncAgreed. And a config for BBB would be good too.09:34
iwamatsuOK, I ask BBB config to Jan.09:34
patersoncFor both boards, I think we need a config for both 4.4 and 4.1909:34
kazupatersonc iwamatsu Thank you again09:35
iwamatsuAnd I send PR to config repo, OK?09:35
masashi910AI: add config for qemux86-64 and BBB. Is it reasonable?09:36
kazuI'm OK, thanks09:36
masashi910kazu: thanks.09:36
masashi910any other business?09:36
masashi910309:36
masashi910209:36
masashi910109:37
masashi910#endmeeting09:37
brlogger`Meeting ended Thu Dec 19 09:37:03 2019 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:37
brlogger`Minutes:        https://irclogs.baserock.org/meetings/cip/2019/12/cip.2019-12-19-09.00.html09:37
brlogger`Minutes (text): https://irclogs.baserock.org/meetings/cip/2019/12/cip.2019-12-19-09.00.txt09:37
brlogger`Log:            https://irclogs.baserock.org/meetings/cip/2019/12/cip.2019-12-19-09.00.log.html09:37
*** brlogger` changes topic to "Civil Infrastructure Platform Project. Find the logs at https://irclogs.baserock.org/cip/"09:37
wensthanks!09:37
kazuThank you everyone :)09:37
pave1Thanks!09:37
suzuki90Thank you!09:37
masashi910thanks bye-bye!09:37
*** suzuki90 has quit IRC09:37
iwamatsuthank you09:38
patersoncSee you in the new year!09:38
patersonciwamatsu: I've sent some MR reviews your way, if you have time09:38
pave1wens: Would it make sense to pick up patches from stable-5.4 as a backup? That way if regular expressions fail to pick them on the list, they are still not lost...09:38
iwamatsupatersonc: OK, I will check09:38
patersonciwamatsu: Thank you!09:38
pave1wens: But my main question was: is there list of patches that should be backported (or at least looked at) somewhere?09:39
patersonchttps://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/ ;)09:40
wenspave1: currently there isn't. for now it's just looking at what was posted vs what was picked up09:40
pave1patersonc: :-). I was hoping for a little.. shorter list ;-).09:40
patersoncgit log -1000 ?09:40
pave1patersonc: I hate you :-).09:41
patersoncYou're welcome!09:41
patersoncIt's a serious question though, especially when Greg stops supporting 4.4/4.1909:41
patersoncI wonder if CIP will have to have our own AI tool like Sasha? (well, re-use his)09:41
wensI guess the issue is the same, humans are needed to judge whether a patch needs to be backported09:42
pave1wens: Ok, so if you see something critical (maybe those 3 CVEs?), could you notify the lists?09:42
pave1patersonc: I believe starting from Linus' tree is ... way too much work.09:42
pave1patersonc: But we can start from the oldest -stable that _is_ supported.09:43
pave1patersonc: If we filter out everything with Sasha's name on it, we may have quite reasonable list.09:43
patersoncTrue09:43
wenspave1: regarding having stable-5.4 as a backup, could you elaborate?09:44
patersoncPresumably not everything Sasha selects is bad though?09:44
pave1patersonc: Alternatively.... there are distributions such as SuSE doing very similar work.09:44
pave1patersonc: But when I checked, they were maintaining 4.4 but not 4.19 iirc.09:44
wenspave1: you mean looking at v5.4..stable-5.4.y right?09:45
pave1patersonc: I have not really seen many from Sasha screaming "this is critical". People are normally quite good at adding cc: stable.09:46
patersoncpave1: Fair doos09:47
wenseither that, or other people figure out something broke and patch(es) need to be backported09:47
pave1wens: My idea was.. if the scripts fail to pick up patch from the stable mailing list, and the patch appears in stable-5.4, we still may want to look at it.09:48
wensI see. The scripts will pick up stable-5.4 rc review series though09:48
wensunless Greg changes his tooling, or somehow sneaks in a patch without review09:48
wensbut hey, Linus does that lol09:49
pave1Aha. Ok... in such case, I guess we don't need to do much.09:49
pave1wens: Hmm. Greg does that, too.09:49
wensok, I'll look into it and maybe merge that into the produced patch-list09:49
pave1wens: When problems are found during 4.19.91-rc1 review, he'll push 4.19.91-rc2 to the git, maybe with some new patches, and I'm not sure if those are cc-ed to the lists...09:50
wensI don't recall seeing them marked that way09:51
wensso probably not09:51
iwamatsuCC doesn't seem to be. It is reported that rc2 has been released.09:52
pave1You mentioned 3 CVEs in need of backporting. Do you have links (or could you send them to cip-dev)?09:53
wensthe tool also doesn't know about rejected patches, so presumably we would want to add an ignore list09:53
wensthe 3 CVEs are not fixed in mainline yet09:53
pave1wens: Aha, ok.09:55
wensthe one that was fixed has fixes all the way back to 4.1409:55
wenspave1: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=4ea99936a1630f51fc3a2d61a58ec4a1c4b7d55a09:57
pave1Ok, that may get an CVE... but hopefully people are not enabling random debugging options in production, so I don't see it as critical.09:58
pave1(But thanks :-) )09:59
wensno problem09:59
wensthere's a bunch of CVEs that are really corner cases... like the "crafted filesystem" types10:00
wensnot something the average user is going to run into10:00
pave1Yep. Having a CVE does not mean bug is critical, really. "Denial of service" aka "kernel crash" can get a CVE, too....10:01
pave1patersonc: I did push to https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/tree/ci/pavel/linux-cip to get the kernel tested, but I don't see usual icons from the CI.10:05
pave1Do I need to do something else?10:05
patersoncpave1: When did you push?10:06
pave1Few minutes ago.10:06
patersoncSometimes there are some delays on GitLab's servers10:06
patersoncI suggest wait 10 mins10:07
patersoncIf it still doesn't happen you can kick the build off manually10:07
patersonchttps://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/pipelines/new10:07
pave1Aha, ok :-).10:07
patersoncI see a lot of problems with gitlab.com's services :(10:07
patersoncA lot of 500 errors etc. when trying to access their own repositories etc.10:08
pave1Hosting sources is quite complex problems, it seems.10:08
patersoncI've heard that rumour!10:08
pave1:-)10:08
patersonc* goes afk for 15 mins10:09
* patersonc * goes afk for 15 mins10:09
*** masashi910 has quit IRC10:21
*** masashi910 has joined #cip10:26
patersoncpave1: Did you trigger it manually in the end?10:30
pave1patersonc: Yes, and that did the trick.10:38
*** kazu has quit IRC10:42
patersonc:)10:43
pave1Thanks for help and bye for now...10:49
patersoncttfn10:49
patersonciwamatsu: ping10:50
*** pave1 has quit IRC10:52
*** masashi910 has quit IRC10:57
*** cp- has quit IRC16:05
*** cp- has joined #cip16:06
*** cp- has quit IRC16:11
*** cp- has joined #cip16:12
*** therisen has quit IRC16:16
*** m4t has quit IRC20:18
*** m4t has joined #cip20:21
*** masashi910 has joined #cip22:59
*** rajm has quit IRC23:01
*** masashi910 has quit IRC23:04
*** masashi910 has joined #cip23:04

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!