| *** patersonc has joined #cip | 06:31 | |
| *** rajm has joined #cip | 07:12 | |
| * rajm runs a successful health check on BBB and then a lava-tool test with a fresh build using v4.4.75-cip6 which also worked :-) (both on a debian host , now back to that Windows10 investigation) | 08:09 | |
| patersonc | Happy days | 08:10 |
|---|---|---|
| patersonc | Am I right in thinking that there used to be a linux-cip-rt branch somewhere | 08:10 |
| rajm | starting the week well... I'm not sure on that will see what bwh comments | 08:11 |
| *** toscalix has joined #cip | 08:13 | |
| patersonc | Hello tolscalix. Repeating a question from a few mins ago: Am I right in thinking that there used to be a linux-cip-rt branch somewhere? | 08:14 |
| patersonc | s/tolscalix/toscalix | 08:15 |
| toscalix | hummm I do not remember seen it | 08:15 |
| patersonc | Maybe I imagined it! | 08:16 |
| *** CTtpollard has joined #cip | 08:31 | |
| *** kristerman has joined #cip | 08:50 | |
| * rajm commits fix to configure_lava.sh so that devices are created in both the linux and widows hosted VMs | 09:11 | |
| toscalix | ah, just saw bwh update | 09:33 |
| toscalix | so we have patches not included in LTS. The fun starts | 09:33 |
| toscalix | CIP is not LTS but based on LTS | 09:33 |
| toscalix | cool | 09:34 |
| toscalix | KSPP included | 09:34 |
| toscalix | health check works with new kernel rajm ? | 10:02 |
| rajm | yes | 10:03 |
| toscalix | and qemu healthcheck on windows with new kernel? | 10:03 |
| rajm | at the moment the qemu health check has only used the linaro website kernel that should probably change | 10:04 |
| rajm | (that's on both linux and windows using only linaro) | 10:05 |
| toscalix | so the windows healthcheck is already working in qemu | 10:08 |
| toscalix | so you have two fronts, make the healthcheck work on windows and then use our own built kernel, correct? | 10:08 |
| rajm | correct (though on the linaro kernel) | 10:08 |
| toscalix | healthcheck (not the qemu one) | 10:09 |
| toscalix | the qemu one works | 10:09 |
| toscalix | already | 10:09 |
| rajm | yes - looking at the BBB HCs - I have a kernel build for the BBB so I can use that once we have the eth->USB issue addressed | 10:11 |
| rajm | there's also still the kernelci webserver not showing builds | 10:11 |
| toscalix | got it | 10:11 |
| toscalix | oh | 10:11 |
| toscalix | in windows, you mean | 10:11 |
| rajm | yes just in windows - no obvious errors it just times out | 10:12 |
| rajm | - or rather sits there with a retrieving data message forever (or at least until I get bored) | 10:13 |
| toscalix | quite some work ahead of you to move on to action 2 | 10:17 |
| rajm | :-( | 10:19 |
| toscalix | keep pushing, setting a testing project is hard | 10:19 |
| rajm | I'll see whether I get some progress otherwise may need #help help | 10:20 |
| toscalix | yep | 10:20 |
| toscalix | I will start the abstract for elce as soon as I finish all the reporting | 10:21 |
| rajm | thought I was going to be onto some progress there - if I connect the BBB to by debian laptop I can telnet onto it via usb from windows unfortunately the HC fails in u-boot I guess an ip issue - if it had worked I was about to create a B@2D project ;-) | 10:32 |
| rajm | though the second time I run the BBB HC (on W10) with that config it works \o/ B@2D is live! | 10:42 |
| toscalix | \o/ | 11:34 |
| toscalix | what changed? | 11:34 |
| rajm | between the 2 runs nothing afaicr - just trying with an initramfs built on that W10 B@D | 11:50 |
| rajm | and that one failed because it's connection to internet was down - from the host it was fine - I've seen this before and wonder whether it needs a ticket opening but I suspect it's a virtualbox problem | 11:58 |
| rajm | problems editing the healthcheck - I suspect this is due to long lines and the windows browser doing things behind the scenes | 12:43 |
| toscalix | windows browser? | 12:55 |
| toscalix | we can recommend a FOSS browser | 12:55 |
| toscalix | for windows, right? | 12:56 |
| toscalix | firefox, for instance | 12:56 |
| toscalix | and forget about a proprietary one | 12:56 |
| toscalix | don't we? | 12:56 |
| rajm | that's probably a good route, I was trying to install as little as possible! | 12:58 |
| toscalix | I assume kernelci does not support explorer | 13:00 |
| rajm | your guess is correct \o/ and the kernelci home page looks a whole lot better ( we could also recommend the use of a FOSS operating system rather than a proprietary one ;-) ) | 13:06 |
| rajm | added a few comments to #106 | 13:12 |
| toscalix | rajm: I think in the pre-requisites we should add something like, is desirable to use linux systems to produce linux based products | 13:22 |
| toscalix | :-) | 13:22 |
| toscalix | I do not see it as a disruptive message when reading a linux foundation initiative wiki page | 13:23 |
| rajm | \o/ yes it's extremely consistent with the ethos | 13:23 |
| toscalix | extremely consistent, I like that | 13:24 |
| toscalix | I assume patersonc and wagi agree on this one | 13:25 |
| patersonc | :) | 13:26 |
| toscalix | bwh: around? | 13:40 |
| rajm | should I start to create a known issue for windows or keep it as a local draft on my m/c until we have everything working? | 13:42 |
| toscalix | known issues is for something we release | 13:43 |
| toscalix | keep it in the ticket and update people through ML | 13:43 |
| toscalix | let's assume for now that the windows support has not been released | 13:46 |
| toscalix | we will update the box when you make it work | 13:46 |
| toscalix | on windows | 13:47 |
| toscalix | hitachi will appreciate we have all the bits in place before promoting the tool internally | 13:47 |
| toscalix | ... if they end up doing it | 13:47 |
| rajm | ok - I'll prepare a ML update at some point tomorrow | 13:47 |
| toscalix | great | 13:47 |
| toscalix | this friday we will provide a report | 13:48 |
| bwh | toscalix: yes | 14:02 |
| toscalix | first thanks for the kernel update | 14:04 |
| bwh | I seem to remembering hearing LF employees don't use Linux on laptops/desktops | 14:07 |
| bwh | I mean, aside from Linus and Greg | 14:07 |
| bwh | patersonc: Daniel Wagner is working on CIP + RT kernels but I don't think he mentioned publishing a branch yet | 14:15 |
| bwh | wagi: Is your 4.4-cip-rt branch published? | 14:16 |
| patersonc | bwh: Thanks, I've already dropped wagi an email :) | 14:17 |
| toscalix | bwh: I moved tomorrows sync up meeting to the afternoon | 14:20 |
| toscalix | not the thursday one though, the public one | 14:20 |
| bwh | toscalix: Right | 14:24 |
| toscalix | bwh: sent you a link to the doc where I will write down the abstract draft for elce. Deadline to present it is this saturday so I will need to run | 14:35 |
| rajm | and a local test of the v4.4.75-cip6 kernel HC's on the BBB (host Windows10) | 14:37 |
| bwh | toscalix: Got it | 14:39 |
| rajm | a second HC also runs ok maybe the sporadic failures were due to not updating the OS | 14:53 |
| rajm | after the W10 update still no success connecting to the BBB with USB connected directly don't think it's firewall, wonder whether windows isn't seeing it? I'd expect some notification to popup when I connect | 15:15 |
| toscalix | rajm: nice tweet | 15:38 |
| rajm | :-) the one with the photo or just now? with Vis C++ we didn't have many permissions & had to have an #oper person standing over us - once per reboot!! | 15:41 |
| toscalix | photo one | 15:47 |
| *** rajm has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
| *** toscalix has quit IRC | 16:10 | |
| *** kristerman has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
| *** patersonc has quit IRC | 16:52 | |
| *** CTtpollard has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| *** CTtpollard has joined #cip | 17:10 | |
| *** patersonc has joined #cip | 20:33 | |
| *** patersonc has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
| *** patersonc has joined #cip | 21:05 | |
| *** patersonc has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!