| *** gtristan has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
| *** CTtpollard has joined #baserock | 07:22 | |
| *** rdale has joined #baserock | 07:44 | |
| *** toscalix has joined #baserock | 07:55 | |
| *** jonathanmaw has joined #baserock | 08:16 | |
| *** gtristan has joined #baserock | 08:22 | |
| *** gtristan has joined #baserock | 08:24 | |
| *** tiagogomes has joined #baserock | 08:26 | |
| *** rdale has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
| *** rdale has joined #baserock | 08:54 | |
| *** rdale has quit IRC | 09:16 | |
| *** rdale has joined #baserock | 09:23 | |
| *** faybrocklebank has quit IRC | 09:35 | |
| *** faybrocklebank has joined #baserock | 09:35 | |
| pedroalvarez | bunch of updates for next genivi release: https://gerrit.baserock.org/#/q/topic:genivi-m01 | 11:46 |
|---|---|---|
| pedroalvarez | reviews will be appreciated :) | 12:23 |
| *** CTtpollard has quit IRC | 12:41 | |
| *** CTtpollard has joined #baserock | 12:42 | |
| *** faybrocklebank has quit IRC | 13:15 | |
| *** fay has joined #baserock | 13:17 | |
| *** fay is now known as Guest52301 | 13:18 | |
| *** Guest52301 is now known as faybrocklebank | 13:22 | |
| paulsherwood | pedroalvarez: it all makes sense. how do i provide +1 for all 11 patches? | 14:18 |
| pedroalvarez | sadly one by one, although you could just vote one of them saying that the vote is valid for all of them :) | 14:20 |
| pedroalvarez | any other reviewers? :) :) | 14:30 |
| paulsherwood | pedroalvarez: have you built and tested anything? | 14:41 |
| pedroalvarez | yes, built and deployed a genivi baseline | 14:42 |
| pedroalvarez | booted also, and run the mock-navigation-demo | 14:42 |
| pedroalvarez | ran* | 14:42 |
| paulsherwood | +2 then | 14:45 |
| paulsherwood | i can add that to the gerrit if you like | 14:45 |
| pedroalvarez | no need, I'll make a note when merging | 14:46 |
| pedroalvarez | thanks paulsherwood :) | 14:46 |
| paulsherwood | np | 15:03 |
| paulsherwood | this is the second use-case i've seen recently for tooling to confirm that unpetrify-ref contains ref | 15:04 |
| persia | Why do we have both again? | 15:08 |
| persia | I remember something about human-readable vs. machine-readable, but surely there's a more sensible way to handle that wihich is not so prone to mistakes. | 15:09 |
| pedroalvarez | i seem to remember that having it there has been useful for some tooling that cannot handle sha's directly | 15:09 |
| paulsherwood | persia: ref: is supposed to be a SHA. a SHA could get lost if it's not in a branch or tag... so unpetrify-ref is supposed to represent the branch or tag | 15:10 |
| paulsherwood | s/lost/lost by git gc/ | 15:10 |
| persia | Yes, so why use a SHA for ref:? Could just be a lightweight (non-editabe) tag. | 15:11 |
| persia | Tooling only needs a git ref, which either a sha or tag can be. | 15:11 |
| persia | A branch is also a ref, although branch refs are usually expected not to be stable trees. | 15:11 |
| persia | This was the old "petrify"/"unpetrify" behaviour, where one used branches, and then ran "petrify" to switch to SHAs, and freeze everything, except freezing didn't work, and without CI (which was absent back then), unpetrified trees were usually broken. | 15:12 |
| persia | Note that I think the answer to the above question is complex, but I think it's worth considering in the context of thinking about tooling to have unpetrify-ref be anything other than a comment. | 15:14 |
| SotK | istr that the freezing did work, its just that most of the refs in definitions were branches which led to many rebuilds | 15:20 |
| persia | Oh, the freezing and unfreezing did work. | 15:22 |
| persia | The issue was that if one wasn't frozen, things kept changing in frustrating ways, so we moved to an always-petrified model, hence the leftover "unpetrify-ref", which used to be strictly optional (as it was just "ref" when unpetrified) | 15:23 |
| persia | I suppose if one only used stable branches for well-behaved upstreams, it would be fine, but I'm not sure that was what was being done by those who complained about the unpetrified state. | 15:24 |
| *** gtristan has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| *** jonathanmaw has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
| *** lachlanmackenzie has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
| *** lachlanmackenzie has joined #baserock | 17:10 | |
| *** gtristan has joined #baserock | 17:44 | |
| *** toscalix has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
| *** gtristan_ has joined #baserock | 20:08 | |
| *** gtristan_ has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
| *** gtristan_ has joined #baserock | 20:12 | |
| *** gtristan_ has quit IRC | 20:15 | |
| *** cosm has quit IRC | 23:43 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!